| US 7,599,536 B2 | ||
| Optimizing image signal interpretation for analog image signals from medical image recording devices | ||
| Florian Kraus, Haar (Germany); Christian Maier, Munich (Germany); and Manfred Weiser, Munich (Germany) | ||
| Assigned to BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen (Germany) | ||
| Filed on Aug. 01, 2005, as Appl. No. 11/194,506. | ||
| Claims priority of provisional application 60/606008, filed on Aug. 31, 2004. | ||
| Claims priority of application No. 04018173 (EP), filed on Jul. 30, 2004. | ||
| Prior Publication US 2006/0023926 A1, Feb. 02, 2006 | ||
| Int. Cl. G06K 9/00 (2006.01) | ||
| U.S. Cl. 382—128 [382/132; 128/922] | 12 Claims |

| 1. A method for optimizing the interpretation of analog image signals or sequences of image signals output by medical image
recording devices, comprising the steps of:
a) testing the correlation of consecutively recorded image signals;
b) establishing that the image signals depict the same image if the correlation is not less than a particular threshold value;
c) establishing that the image signals possibly depict different images if the correlation is less than the particular threshold
value; and
d) dynamically adjusting the threshold value if the correlation has changed
wherein when it is established that different images are depicted, a certain number of consecutive image signals below the
threshold value are evaluated, and a standard deviation of the image signals is determined and compared with a pre-set value,
wherein:
c1a) if the number of changed image signals in succession is at least equal to a predetermined sample number and the standard
deviation is lower than the pre-set value, it is established that the correlation deviation has been caused by changes in
the manner of recording the same image; and
c1b) the threshold value is adjusted lower; or
c2a) if the number of changed image signals in succession is at least equal to the predetermined sample number and the standard
deviation is higher than the pre-set value, it is established that the correlation deviation has been caused by continuously
detecting images from different and changing recording situations;
c2b) the threshold value is not adjusted; or
c3) if the number of changed image signals in succession is less than the predetermined sample number, an image signal from
the consecutive image signals is classified as a new image.
|